What Arts Did Jp Morgan Donate to the Metropolitan Museum

The Metropolitan Museum of Art opened in 1872, but it was at the turn of the 20th century that information technology found its vocalization. Reaping the immense wealth in the hands of philanthropists, the museum began to re-imagine itself every bit an encyclopedic museum.

J.P. Morgan, America'southward most well-known finance capitalist, was the money. For a cursory but important time, Roger Fry, the leading English art critic of the period, was the gustation.

In 1904 Morgan was elected president of the Met, and he stocked its board of trustees with like-minded millionaires and elite social arbiters. Morgan'due south own energies as a financier and principal broker were starting time to decline with his avant-garde age, and he intensified his art collecting as a course of compensation.

Never one to approach fine art equally a subject area of deep inquiry, Morgan saw the new model of the museum as a way of indulging the collecting habits of millionaires. He went on a veritable crusade to rent men to shape iii major new departments — virtual museums inside a museum — that featured arms and armor, Egyptian fine art and interior pattern. His phenomenal pace of acquisition was met with wonderment.

Simply masterpieces of European painting were in curt supply, and the Met'southward collection was decidedly unimpressive. Morgan needed a curator who could buy shrewdly, using a newly expanded number of great paintings to enhance the Met'southward reputation.

Roger Fry became — through the approval of Morgan — the curator of paintings at the Met. For Fry, sometime master paintings in the loftier European tradition told a story of genius.

Fry and Morgan differed profoundly and in many ways: by virtue of national characteristics, past training and temperament, by taste and by esthetic education.

Morgan stage-managed the hiring at an elaborate dinner party in the nation's capital. The occasion for the dinner, whose attendees included artists, senators, cabinet members and the president himself, was the coming together of the American Institute of Architects dedicated to fundraising for the American Academy in Rome. Charles McKim, the land's leading architect, having recently finished the building of Morgan's library, wrote to Augustus Saint-Gaudens that "Henry James is coming; in fact everybody, and more we want!"

That night the American Academy enjoyed a $100,000 gift from Henry Walters, the Baltimore collector. Never to be outdone, Morgan matched him dollar for dollar.

Afterwards the dinner, Morgan and Fry met face to face. Fry was not impressed. Morgan utterly dominated the conversation. Fry wrote to his wife back in England that sitting next to Morgan was "like a courtier who has at last got an audience," yet the suppliant must behave tactfully. His portrait of the plutocrat used broad strokes: "Morgan, rather jovial and making jokes, which I parried, about my becoming an American." Morgan promised Fry "a costless hand with the pictures," and since Morgan had "complete control of the whole thing," this was welcome reassurance. Fry's view of Morgan was unflinching: He behaves "exactly as a crowned head and anybody else behaves accordingly."

J.P. Morgan, America's near well-known finance capitalist, was the money. For a brief but of import time, Roger Fry, the leading English art critic of the flow, was the taste.

Fry's Quaker background led him to a compromised admiration for Morgan, but their differences would outweigh both Morgan's fortune and Fry's expertise.

Fry insisted that the public'southward education should be the Met'due south focus. Curatorial finesse was required to construct a history of fine art that would promote public didactics. This was best left in the hands of scholars and connoisseurs. Millionaire financiers, on the other hand, should stick to financial support.

Morgan'south hardheaded attitude, meanwhile, tolerated a willingness to spend, and spend forcefully, but only if the curators were willing to follow the dictates of the board of trustees and its baronial president.

Fry hoped to harness Morgan's wealth to reshape the Metropolitan Museum. He strained Morgan'south budget, however, in choosing a Renoir, and the museum presently restricted his purchases. Fry was thus unable to determine the overall shape of the collection. Eventually he farther offended Morgan when they disagreed as to whether a particular painting of a Madonna and Kid (attributed to Fra Angelico) should get to Morgan'due south ain collection rather than the museum's.

The English critic did not last long, for he couldn't tolerate Morgan's imperious way. So one of Morgan's nearly admirable and publicized appointments came to null.

Even though Fry served only five years on the museum staff, he introduced professional expertise, and an international perspective, to the Met's staff. Eventually Fry'south thought of a coherent, disciplined art history added to the museum's pre-eminence every bit a cultural institution. Morgan went on to go one of the Met's most generous benefactors.

Thanks to both, the museum adult in almost measureless ways.

Charles Molesworth is the author of "The Capitalist and the Critic: J.P. Morgan, Roger Fry, and the Metropolitan Museum of Art" (University of Texas Press), out now.

langeact1999.blogspot.com

Source: https://nypost.com/2016/03/06/how-a-capitalist-and-a-critic-shaped-metropolitan-museum-of-art/

Share this post